To have on Google some negative articles about you can damage forever your future.
Nobody wants to make business or a relationship of any kind with people that are experiencing legal issues , especially if ongoing problems that news websites are reporting about.
Bad Press is bad. People say that all kind of publicity is okay, as long as you are mentioned in the news ! Negative publicity is awful and you know it.
Negative news articles on Google can be removed, you no longer have to live with these bad press and negative publicity.
How to remove negative news articles from Google search results? There is only one real way : take the news websites to court. Put huge legal pressure on the website’s owners and let them understand that a defamation lawsuit can financially damage them forever.
The moment they realize that their own pocket is in danger, they usually will remove the article within hours.
How to remove bad press from Google? By being extremely aggressive with the websites that published the articles you want to remove.
How to de-index the articles from Google? Take into consideration that after the removal of the articles from the source, it means from the websites, usually Google and other search engines will stop to index them because they become dead pages and they do not list pages without content.
No other solutions are feasible. What is called online reputation management is dead. It does not work at all , because it is based on the wrong assumption that you need to publish positive information in order to push down the negative one . This SEO method was maybe working years ago, but no longer valid. You cannot expect to trick Google.
Google will always place negative information on the first page, because negative information is their priority, because bad press is what people are looking for and this drives more traffic and therefore more income from advertisement.
So , if you have negative news articles on Google, make no mistakes about it, you just need to remove them permanently from the source, there is no other way around.
Businesses can take advantage of a bevy of methods to manage their online reputations, including:
Search engine optimization
Social response tools
Link portfolio management
To summarize, reputation management has to do with influencing what people see and how they think about you or your brand.
In today’s plugged-in world, reputation management happens in the digital sphere and is a core component of a brand’s marketing strategy — in fact, it’s critical to their overall survival. As reputation management grows in importance for both individuals and businesses, we can acknowledge its unethical manifestations while realizing just how effective it can be when used properly.
Perhaps the most salient reputation management question to answer is Who’s in control of your reputation? This is the single biggest sticking point in understanding reputation management, and it’s a huge reason why reputation mismanagement is so rampant.
Misunderstanding this crucial first point leads to a multitude of sins, false steps, confusion, and outright blunders.
Let’s answer the question as clearly possible: A brand or individual has very limited control over their reputation.
Although there is no scientific way to analyze what portion of your reputation is under your control, here's a helpful way to visualize it. If your reputation is the large blue box below, the portion that you control is the white box in the lower left—and it’s very small.
How prevalent is Wikipedia in search results?
Wikipedia is on the first page of Google search results more than 50% of the time. Wikipedia dominates the search engine results, and it pays to know why.
In one study, researchers found that Wikipedia appears on the first page of Google for as many as half of all search queries.
Researchers conducted a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and found that Wikipedia ranks for as many as 99% of all search queries. (The study is dated 2009, but informal research corroborates the current validity of those findings).
Wikipedia ranks on the first page more often for commercial queries than informational queries, meaning that Wikipedia has ranking dominance regardless of query intent.
Your Brand’s Voice – We design holistic solutions that give our clients control over how their brand is seen online. We ensure their earned, owned, paid, social, and community content is visible in search. Every move is strategically planned – taking into consideration how it will impact the brand.
Data-Driven Strategies – With unique technology and measurable methods, we provide clients with deep analysis in real-time. We utilize a proprietary cache of search page data to create in-depth peer comparisons and to set a customized course of action. During the course of the program, clients see a quantifiable impact, with necessary adjustments to ensure your strategy is working.
Organic and Creative – We continually look for new ways to enhance your digital brand. We ensure that high-quality content is discoverable and that social profiles and community-sourced content are accurate and prioritized.
Cutting-Edge Technology – We have developed technology based on years of experience. Custom-built technology provides our clients with unique insights and a competitive edge.
The Personal Touch – We work collaboratively with internal teams and external partners – thinking, brainstorming, reporting, and shaping your brand strategy together. We report regularly and are on-call and available for consultations when our clients need us.
Fresh crowdsourced content
Why is Wikipedia such a dominant force in the search engines? It has to do with technical performance and user experience. On the technical side, Wikipedia is fast and lean. When was the last time Wikipedia loaded slowly or was experiencing downtime?
It's also frequently updated since individuals are given the opportunity to update content. This keeps it fresh, and deserving of Google's blessing.
Do consumers trust Wikipedia?
Yes. On the user side, consumers have a general attitude of acceptance towards Wikipedia’s crowdsourced information. The alleged purpose of the website is to provide unbiased information on virtually any topic. It takes little time and effort to access this information. As an Internet user searches for anything from the common cold (Wikipedia has position 3 in Google) to carburetor icing (Wikipedia has 1 in Google), Wikipedia is the most prevalent and convenient source of information and therefore trust.
Reputation, as it turns out, is largely out of our hands. At the risk of being redundant, here’s the definition of reputation management once more:
Reputation management is the effort to influence what and how people think of a brand or person.
At its best, reputation management is only an effort.
And note that reputation management attempts to influence how people think. Shaping someone’s thinking? You can probably come up with a whole lot of reasons why that is
A) not a good idea, B) fraught with obstacles and C) nearly hopelessly ineffective.
And that’s our point. Reputation management deals in the murky waters of psychology, where cognitive biases, individual perceptions, and past experiences wield enormous power.
What do you control your reputation?
In terms of your business’s reputation, you control your business’s or personal brands' (your own) actions. And it’s possible that even on that point, your control is limited.
Running a business is obviously a large task. Businesses have a lot of moving parts. Many businesses have a lot of employees, each of whom has some degree of autonomy in how they function, what they say and how they live their personal lives.
Though you control some things in running a business, you don’t control everything. You can’t. And that leaves your reputation in the hands (more precisely, the minds) of those who perceive your company.
The actions that you undertake as a business leader do shape reputation in some way. If, for example, you decide to embezzle millions of dollars, put cyanide in your donuts or openly support weapons smugglers, these actions will have a marked impact on your reputation.
What percentage of consumers comparison shop?
A very large percentage of people always comparison shop. According to Mckinsey, 87% of people do comparative shopping for every single purchase they make, and they shop on multiple channels.